Well, you said something about ethics and legality and linked article, I wasn't the one who moved things in that direction but ok, I guess it is for another topic, anyway, I just don't think it is good argument because we are discussing scam accusation, evidences and we should stick to this, what I want to say is that most accusations against every bookie is almost for the same things, while some casinos are tagged and many forum members just go with "yeah, they are scam, look at feedbacks" or they just link each and every possible scam accusation they can find (example, casino is tagged and flagged:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5186509.0 -> multi accounts, IP detection, the same device etc
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454521.0 -> casino allowed player to bet over bet limit and took funds later, rule is hidden somewhere within ToS
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184263.0 -> My mom gambled (likely multi account))

...in some other (the same) cases users just go with "it's in their ToS", "they sponsor someone, they are rich, they can't scam someone for 100$", "they are trusted therefore they don't scam", "lol, another Russian noob cheater". And when few users open scam accusation and it turns out that they indeed are cheaters and some shills start going in each scam accusation to troll accusers they create very bad environment and stereotype "whoever opens scam accusation is automatically cheater and they defraud site", like casino is always 100% right and they can't make mistakes. Well, that is simple not true.