Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Should confirmed liars with close links to other liars and scammers be on DT1?
by
Laudanum
on 13/08/2020, 16:44:17 UTC
You claim that you know of no liars or deceiver on DT1 and DT2?
Now where did I say that?
But marlboroza wants me to be you the pharmacist.
Why are you making things up? I have never said that you are The Pharmacist. This user is deliberately trying to cause fight between forum members.

Look above you said you don't know. When I said DT is full of liars and scammers.
I just read you said according to the pharmacist dt must be aged 2012 and have 100btc or something just like what I had said?

Unless he shares my views it looked like you were saying I was him?
If you were not saying that then fine. It makes no difference to my thread. 
Last thing I want is you two falling out dear friends.

So far too much irrelevant speculation on "who" when it makes no difference at all. I am presenting discussion based events that anyone can verify for themselves.

Let's focus on the stipulated topic.

Let's try a simple one for you moronbozo.
Do you accept lfcbitcoin lied ?

I have quoted the post from hacker that contains the pms and lfc claiming he never told anyone to oppose the flag

Yes or no?

Let's see what moronbozo comes up with. Some strange excuse  or will run off.

The tactic to divert to who is asking the question is boring and desperate.

Should people who lie about asking others to protect their sponsors by rejecting flags be on DT1?
We can discuss his links to other documented liars and scammers  after.