That's why it's arbitrary to only do your comparison for just today. Each crypto is in a different part of its own market cycle.
You make a great job of defending against a line of argument I'm not making.
How does any of that support the idea that a REDUCTION in the proportion of mined supply is going to improve our store of value (Given that we already have only half of what other coins do) ?
I really don't agree with your reasoning which I think is simply technical hand waving over cycles. There's no "cycle" by which our "real" ranking is somehow arguably higher than what our current markcetcap says it is.
Well, you said DASH is less competitive than some of the other POW coins because its marketcap is less than theirs and because DASH has too high masternode rewards. This connection you made of course is your opinion as there's nothing factual you've presented to prove it's not something else instead.
I said doing a market comparison only for today is arbitrary because DASH is at a different point in its market cycle than these other coins. And in fact, even so, YTD, DASH is very competitive.
I never stated that a reduction in the proportion of mined supply will improve DASH's store of value. I said the change is negligible and I don't think it will improve or hurt DASH's store of value.
I have no issue with your opinion on masternode rewards being too high. My issue is you present your opinion as fact mostly because you say so.
I also never said that DASH's marketcap should be higher than what it actually is, nor that our "real" ranking based on marketcap is somehow higher. I said that it will be higher and will recover faster and pass other POW coins like XMR in due time (2021 almost for sure)
Maybe I'm wrong... you can call me out then I guess. But even then you still only have assumptions as to why DASH might not be as competitive (even though it is so far for 2020)