He easily does. Same thing with Sunny King and proof of stake. Since not even the developer himself really seems to understand how proof of stake works, and all the secondary or unintended consequences of each variable, few people have the authority to create a consensus to stop something if he wants it to happen. Bitcoin is the same way. It's easier to understand the general concepts of PoW, but there's still secondary or unintended consequences that make the "authority figures" divisible by a handful, or maybe even 1, especially when each change has to conform to future plans that aren't even known by all parties.
Listen nooblet, stop positing that if you've eaten cereal in the morning three times this past week this is "what's done in the morning". Some people fuck in the morning. For instance, your parents, which is how a cereal eating snotty brat like you even exists in the first place.
Is there any post that you don't sound like an angry psychopath? Someone might mistake you for Anonymint, since you're both angry egomaniacs, but there's at least some substance in what he posts. Ok, we get it, some fool at the Bitcoin foundation pocketed some money, just like the premine scammers in the altcoin forum. Where do you and your unpaved road in Romania come into this picture again? You're feigning moral outrage while basically being a complete dirt bag yourself.
There's only one person that actually matters at that foundation. He's going to do whatever his own free will is regardless of yours, and you'll be his hostage for the foreseeable future until Bitcoin is done being forked. You can stop pretending like you have any power over the situation. Since you're so morally outraged, I guess the only option would be to divorce yourself from Bitcoin entirely, then you can go on living a pious lifestyle as a normal Romanian school girl/boy/thing.
The rest of us will go on realizing this isn't a democracy.