Quote from: ArcheAdvertising on August 20, 2020, 09:51:07 PM

Quote from: pixie85 on August 20, 2020, 09:45:11 PM

There's no reason to do it. PoS is less secure.

The only advantages of using it would be power consumption but that's pushed by the green enthusiasts who don't understand that the power used to mine Bitcoin would be produced and sold anyway. If we stopped mining all around the world the power plants would not start to shut down because of no demand.

With PoS Bitcoin would lose an important feature and with it a lot of value.

If in fact I do not assure anything, I just wanted to know some points of view, I am a journalist and a big fan of cryptography that is why I present this publication to know the point of view of all, or at least of a majority with more experience than me . I still think we have to see how ETH and ADA are doing. Although assuming that they succeed does not mean that BTC will do it but it is a possibility.

That's great. I'm not trying to find reasons for your post nor am I judging you.

All that I'm saying is we really don't need PoS because it's in no way superior to PoW. PoS is just a way to shut up people who say crypto is bad for the environment.
ADA was designed with PoS in mind so it's not the greatest coin to compare. ETH is better because it will change it's reward distribution years after its creation.