You didn't score anything -- we're not even playing on the same board.
I'm not going to debate against someone who adamantly claims he understands the arguments I present when he clearly does not.
The reason that it's clear you have no idea what I'm trying to say is because you pulled the "he said something that doesn't epitomize the glory of the scientific method, so he obviously must hate anything and everything resulting from the scientific method" straw man of of your you-know-what.
I'm very glad we're not on the same board,
as this means my communications skills are all good.
I like your last sentence, as
it gives away all your bias. Keep it if you like of couse, but seriously, keep it for yourself unless you enjoy presenting yourself like a fool in public.
You said what you said in public. I you feel misunderstood - seriously rethink your most basic communication skills. They're non-existant on that case (for whatever reasons).
To me, that isolated case is closed anyway.
Referring to bold highlights:
1) No, it doesn't. Communication skills maybe, but good at logical deductions, no.
2) Do you know what a straw man is? I'm telling you its a straw man, and yet you still managed to come up with more nonsense. If pointing out your logical fallacies implies bias, then I'm biased as f***.