So let me get this straight, you're arguing that this noise-polluting, criminal-hiring, extortionist mega-conglomerate can survive for more than a quarter in the free market?
Without government bailouts this corporation won't last more than a month.
Why does that seem so far fetched? It happens all the time.
Look up a little history of Latin America and see what corporations had going on down there. They hired hit men to kill union bosses, sub-contracted for torture and kidnap of employees that disagreed with them, and many other such blatantly illegal/immoral activities.
How is the market going to punish them when 99.9995% of the people that comprise the market have no idea this stuff took place because they're scattered all over the world, but these events happened only in a specific area? I bet YOU don't know the history I'm speaking of. I bet YOU don't even know what company I'm referring to. I bet YOU can't even find it on Google without knowing EXACTLY what you're looking for. I'll give a hint, they're still around and thriving - without a single bailout.
Coca Cola Company, no I didn't look it up.
Dude, that was related to the cultivation of
cocaine, which is and was much moreso in the past, a fundamental ingredient in Coke Classic.
EDIT: Well, it
was and
educated guess; but if I got it wrong it's only because of the vast number of choices. Or perhaps I got it right the first time, so you chose to find another example. Doesn't matter much, though; none of you guys have bothered to look up where these laws come from. I didn't make them up. And they have little to do with
statutory laws.
And keep insulting myself or your other opposition, AyeYo, and you will find that your stuck in newbie hell with non-existent post history. Worse, if I can swing it.