You're only demonstrating that you don't understand libertarianism. You don't need 100% agreement on a single issue much less all of the issues for it to be implemented.
That's because you're a raging hypocrite, something we established and moved past over twenty pages ago.
Yet a further demonstration of your ignorance. Self-defense is not aggression therefore it can't be a violation of the non-aggression principle.
That's because you're a raging hypocrite, something we established and moved past over twenty pages ago.
Self-defense isn't aggression, but once again you're playing a semantics game. What you're saying ("self-defense") and what you actually plan to do (force people to follow your beliefs) are worlds apart.