This is not rare and in the past it boosted site performance quite a lot -
So in the end I am leaning towards the opinion that the dilution fee would penalize the investors who divest to play, while it would not provide enough profit for long-term investors to justify it.
On the other hand with dillution fee, you will be encouraging people to stay invested and lock their investment on the site which means that the site would be able to provide higher max profit because the bankroll probably wouldnt decrease ( On average )
yes, some of them lost.
While some could win big and reduce the bankroll then invest it back on the bankroll
This week Scott and me will discuss the commission model and if it can be improved, especially given the recent profit volatility and loses.
Some other site stop taking commission / reduce the commission that they take after the house lose alot. This could probably be an option for a while until the investor profits gets back to almost what it was