A “spelling mistake” between SHA-256 and Quark while creating an announcement on Bitcointalk for the crypto community! Nice explanation! With other words: The one who wrote the announcement has no idea what he's talking about! Including your whole fake department which is checking the announcement! You surely will come up with a similar explanation how you'll handle the deep hard fork in implementing a complete other algorithm in the blockchain as consensus rule, better to say: a mix of different encodings? There's absolutely no sense to build a complete new and different blockchain connected to a blockchain from a complete another encoding. Everyone who has a little knowledge in crypto related stuff knows that. Even implementing the last Bitcoin hash to the next blockheader would give a problem. You should finally reveal who's the author of this social experiment and how many potential victims you caught with this ridiculous campaign!