i can say i've been called a sigspammer a couple of times
Let me start by saying: "me too!". Everyone's entitled to their opinion.Creating a thread about someone and not letting them respond is quite nasty. I did that once to Quickseller (I think) and I still feel bad about it. 
Agreed!Local rule : dkbit98&btcltcdigger are not allowed to post here - their opinion is already quite familiar to me.
Can I persuade you into changing this local rule? It looks better on you to allow the accused to defend themselves.For what it's worth: I like how you guys are using the correct Neutral feedback to express your opinion on each other:
Neutral (shown as =1)
Don't worry too much about it. Neutral feedback is meant for opinions.- Use Neutral feedback for anything that doesn't mean someone can or can't be trusted. This can be good feedback, for instance when someone helped you out.
- I think Neutral Feedback is currently undervalued on Bitcointalk. It's a great tool to de-escalate without drastic consequences. Please use it when appropriate.
dkbit98 behaved quite irrational in that linked topic.
The kids are too wild to thoroughly read everything, but I noticed this:I won't go more offtopic but
Atleast you filled your signature quote mr.Right 
Adios
It would be so much better to just report off-topic posts, especially on a serious board like Hardware wallets.Adios
Don't take it personal.
That's good advice for virtually anything you see on the internet. You and dkbit98 are both helpful posters as far as I'm concerned
My suggestion: both of you bury the hatchet. You're both valuable members of the forum.
So much I can agree on in one post My suggestion: both of you bury the hatchet. You're both valuable members of the forum.
Ideally both these users should ignore each other and go their separate ways but that almost never happens here on Bitcointalk.
I really don't get why people would read posts if they already know they don't like what they're going to read. Adding a few users per year makes the forum nicer to read.