I was fully prepared to bash Lucius when I went through the thread. In fact, that was my original intention: to present a devil's advocate in the presence of many consenting opinions.
There is nothing more to say about how Lucius handled the situation. It was the exact pace that I would have considered from someone that 'aims to curb spam' and it was the minimal number of posts required to stop the conversation.
Analysis:
The first post that starts stepping into this topic from dkbit98's end is #27 and the relevant sections are quoted:
Tautologically, we can say that dkbit is claiming, "there are no smartphones that are smaller than the Nokia phone," which was answered by Lucius in his response:
It sufficiently answers the question, but dkbit98 is unaware of the measurements causing Lucius to answer again.
Then, we're met with this reply:
It is the epitome of defending a bad take.
Lucius's final post ends the discussion, which means that all the posts required for resolving it were posted - there haven't been any extra posts that seemed unnecessary.
And then, ironically...
I still use phone like that and there is nothing wrong it. Working great.
If you like to be tracked everywhere with stupid smart phones go ahead
There is nothing more to say about how Lucius handled the situation. It was the exact pace that I would have considered from someone that 'aims to curb spam' and it was the minimal number of posts required to stop the conversation.
Analysis:
The first post that starts stepping into this topic from dkbit98's end is #27 and the relevant sections are quoted:
You can try as much as you want but you can't find small smartphone anymore, they are all big and larger than Nokia phone shown before.
So I don't understand people want to have miniature hardware wallet and big smart phones
So I don't understand people want to have miniature hardware wallet and big smart phones
Tautologically, we can say that dkbit is claiming, "there are no smartphones that are smaller than the Nokia phone," which was answered by Lucius in his response:
They may not be as small as before, but there are some that are quite small (twice the size of today's standard sizes).
PalmPhone - 3.3-inch display or even smaller Unihertz Atom - 2.45-inch display
PalmPhone - 3.3-inch display or even smaller Unihertz Atom - 2.45-inch display
It sufficiently answers the question, but dkbit98 is unaware of the measurements causing Lucius to answer again.
Then, we're met with this reply:
Who the fuck knows about Unihertz Atom?
Only you probably, as I never heard about it like most people.
What phone do you have? Is it Unihertz Atom??
Only you probably, as I never heard about it like most people.
What phone do you have? Is it Unihertz Atom??
It is the epitome of defending a bad take.
Lucius's final post ends the discussion, which means that all the posts required for resolving it were posted - there haven't been any extra posts that seemed unnecessary.
And then, ironically...
Nobody has owned a phone which looks like the Passport for 15+ years.
Wrong.I still use phone like that and there is nothing wrong it. Working great.
If you like to be tracked everywhere with stupid smart phones go ahead