Creationists mostly deserve kindness and understanding, not scorn.
Not anymore.
Their blatant attempt to corrupt and twist science in order to re-package their delusion is unforgivable. It will be met head on with reason and logic.
Did you not see my post directly above yours? There are laws that show that that information had to come from an intelligent source. Who is doing the "twisting" and "corrupting?" There is plenty of logic and reason to support intelligent design. If you are so sure of your position just give me an explanation of why you do not agree with my points above. Otherwise I will assume that you are not using your reason and logic to counter them.
Actually you only make one point:
1) Since the DNA code of all life forms is clearly within the definition domain of information, we conclude there must be a Sender.
all other points assume that point 1 is true and therefore don't stand on their own.
Your conclusion that there must be a sender is also your premise. There must be a sender. And your other arguments proof the sender by a proof that is only possible when you already assume that there is a sender.
TL.DR. The argument that there
must be an intelligent sender for information to exist is just pulled out of thin air, with no proof that it is true or any arguments to back it up. Without this assumption the rest of the arguments are totally hollow.
Why do you conclude, there must be an intelligent sender?