How was this discovered ? Perhaps on twitter and linked to debian paste site ?
Why did somebody paste this to this debian paste site ?
The original paste has been deleted, why ?
You're barking up the wrong tree. It makes no difference how or where it was posted. The signatures can be verified so CSW is a liar.
I haven't gotten to that point yet.
I just read the main complaint. There are no links in that document to anything else.
How is this complaint linked to any bitcoin addressess ?
I am not only interested in Craig and this lawsuit... but also why somebody would sign this and where this information came from.
So
I keep an open mind =D
Even though you, Skybuck, are trying to present yourself as if you were having some kind of a purported "open mind," you come off either as a bit of a delusional fuck or someone who wants to put out misinformation to rant about a lot of stuff that has already been beaten to death in a variety of public threads.
Instead of looking at what has already been concluded, you come at your purported analysis as if you have fresh eyes when in fact you are just failing and refusing to really look at the evidence and logic for what it is, a fucking BIG ass scam that is largely originated by fucktwats craig, calvin et al.
So, yeah there is nothing wrong with attempting to go over a variety of evidence and logic to come to fresh perspectives, but you really need to do a lot more research and stop coming off as if you are purposefully failing and refusing to appreciate some of the most salient evidentiary points that have already been presented in a variety of interwebs places.
When I traded virtual goods in Star Trek Online I was many times called a SCAMMER and I laughed it it very hard. So I can imagine what Craig must feel like if he truely is Satoshi... But he could also be a real scammer. I don't know.
I was impressed by his technical babble during a presentation though. Some things I had never heard of... I thought to myself if this guy is a scammer then he is the world's best scammer haha !
This is not a run of the mill run of the street scammer. One would have to study many many technical stuff to be this kind of scammer. That calls it into doubt/question.
It's pretty clear to me at least this guy probably worked at or for some Companies not sure.
I have barely scretch the surface of this... Only read main document once again. Read it some time ago.
Now that there is hard evidence of somebody singing a message against Craig with a estimated value of 72+ million euro's it's getting my attention and interest.
So far it was some court case in USA with some possible scammer, but now well that has changed a little bit =D
It's easy for somebody to call "SCAM !" and "SCAMMER !" but actually going over the evidence and making up one own mind is a lot of work.
It's also easy to follow others and believe other's conclusions.... I am the kind of guy that wants to make his own conclusions based on evidence.
Presenting evidence as easily and cleanly as possible would help a lot.
Fortunately I am now behind a fast laptop... and this court listener website is helping a bit by providing links to possible further evidence.
Can I trust court listener I dont know... so far it seems somewhat legit. Is there any better/legal source of information? So far this seems somewhat sufficient.
Here is a question though: Why are some documents behind a paywell ? BUY ON PACER it says. Is this court listener way of making money ?
Bye for now,
Skybuck.