In the case scenario, I don’t see how the court order can pinpoint an exact address in custody by the Exchange itself. User U is chased, and therefore his logical account on the Exchange is pursuable, but the inner distribution on customer assets to addresses is not known (but to the Exchange themselves), and if the Exchanges Stablecoins are distributed over 100 addresses (cold storage and not), then how can the court order pinpoint a given address that is being managed by the Exchange?