Cryptotourist, an NSA OSINT analyst tipped me that
the rank-watchers in Meta forgot you. SwayStars rise to Full Member merited mention. Your earlier rise to Sr. is listed on the front page.
Are you out of the conspiracy to take my money, turn it into 21,000 BTC, and then take over the forum? :-/
I am in a urban environment overcrowded, heavily polluted, crime-ridden, disease-infested anthropoid sewer prone to simultaneous prison-style lockdowns and riots with huge RE taxes.
Move.
I would imagine that in SanFran or NY anything less than 200-250K/year in income is a strain.
The EU tentative regulation that Biodom mentioned, as I understand it, is aimed at tokens issued by corporate actors (libra is explicitly mentioned, and tether would qualify as well).
You are confused.
The article explicitly addressed Bitcoin.
The long-awaited regulation will address the high volatility of cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, the most popular of these digital tokens, and the risks posed by systemic ones, like Libra.
The portion that I quoted immediately followed some blather about a market worth around $350 billion, and spread over more than 6,700 digital currencies.
The article was at some points unclear about which bureaucratic diktat applied to which type of cryptocurrency; but I very well realized that some portions only spoke of Libra
et al., and I followed the context accordingly.
(The media tend to mangle the facts, anyway. When I read the article, I cursed at not having the source document available.)
It could simplify things for helpfully ensnare some people - the unbanked unenslaved come to mind.
Why is being unbanked supposed to be a bad thing? It is an Orwellian brainwash-term.
And why could the lives of the
bank-free not be better improved by Bitcoin?
Are you saying you'd risk your money by keeping it in fiat in some bank? The term "money in the bank" is misleading unless the "bank" is your own i.e. Bitcoin.
This.I could never understand why people keep fiat savings in banks.