⭐ Merited by Ratimov (1)
I would like to discuss the negative feedback that was sent to Legendary johhnyUA from Default Trust member bob123.
I've asked bob123 in PM on this case six months ago, but there was no response from him.
What Bitcointalk community thinks about this comment?
At first glance such statement from johhnyUA can confuse, but let me publish the message, which may explain his position.
I believe that there are unspoken ethical rules that help people coexist together and build a harmonious community, as well as state laws which do not always help people, but sometimes restrict their freedom. By using cryptocurrencies in some countries, you do not violate anything, while in other countries you will be punished. So, is it right to blame people and mark them with a negative trust if they don't agree to obey such laws?
[Map: Legal Status of Cryptocurrencies]
I will also quote a well-known history researcher from Russia Yevgeny Ponasenkov about laws.
I've asked bob123 in PM on this case six months ago, but there was no response from him.
What Bitcointalk community thinks about this comment?
| _User________ | _Date______ | _Reference_ | _Comments__ |
| bob123 | 2019-07-25 | Reference | This user doesn't care if something is legal or not. Quote: "[...] so i don't fucking care if something is "against the law" [...]" Check reference for context. |
At first glance such statement from johhnyUA can confuse, but let me publish the message, which may explain his position.
<...>
Quote out of context. I knew that one day someone will try to use it as an argument. In reality, it was about the fact that i don't accept arguments like "this is against the law" because the law is very different from country to country. In some countries "against the law" is do not kill fallen woman (in meaning woman that suck not only husband's cock) in some freedom of speech is "against the law" or freedom of existence to some nations.
And also it was in speech about "I will not follow their ToS because in my country it's against the law, ha ha" so i just told that i don't accept argument's like "this is against the law" because it's shitty statement. One day, in the future cryptocurrencies can become "against the law"
don't fucking care if something is "against the law"
Quote out of context. I knew that one day someone will try to use it as an argument. In reality, it was about the fact that i don't accept arguments like "this is against the law" because the law is very different from country to country. In some countries "against the law" is do not kill fallen woman (in meaning woman that suck not only husband's cock) in some freedom of speech is "against the law" or freedom of existence to some nations.
And also it was in speech about "I will not follow their ToS because in my country it's against the law, ha ha" so i just told that i don't accept argument's like "this is against the law" because it's shitty statement. One day, in the future cryptocurrencies can become "against the law"
I believe that there are unspoken ethical rules that help people coexist together and build a harmonious community, as well as state laws which do not always help people, but sometimes restrict their freedom. By using cryptocurrencies in some countries, you do not violate anything, while in other countries you will be punished. So, is it right to blame people and mark them with a negative trust if they don't agree to obey such laws?
[Map: Legal Status of Cryptocurrencies]
I will also quote a well-known history researcher from Russia Yevgeny Ponasenkov about laws.
Quote from: https://youtu.be/oHmHmNaG3wk?t=1500
The only laws that I admit are the laws of nature, physics, chemistry, biology, history, even sociology. They are absolute, they are objective, they are everywhere and always, they can be checked, they cannot be canceled. And if the laws are written by idiots, liars, hypocrites, satraps, tyrants, no matter who - it's all temporary and local.