Re: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Satoshi Vision - Unmoderated Thread
Some posts which have today been 'deleted' from various 'Bitcoin SV' moderated threads ...
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
90% of BTC transactions - is SCAM
You are wrong, people just don't have alternatives, love has nothing to do with
BSV - is real reliable & transparent alternative against BTC monopoly. Open your eyes, chum
Yes 'ban' these charlatans ... BSV is NOT Bitcoin and CSW has categorically failed to produce any valid cryptographically assured evidence to date.
Is this your twitter account 'Bitcoin SV' ? I appears twitter thinks someone has been 'impersonating' the real Bitcoin (BTC) ...
Which would seem to be the case here ...
"Lulz."
- https://twitter.com/bennd77/status/1303660034971381760
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Until then, Craig has the right to all claims
Craig claimed in court he owned a bunch of addresses ... turns out he does not own them and someone else in fact does ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5250960.0
Care to explain this one? Plus all his other lies ...
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1280422503974928384
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5250960.msg54747021#msg54747021
Bitcoin = BTC
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Satoshi is not dead
Do you feel the difference?
Craig Wright is a fraud. Do you know the difference? - SWIM
Satoshi is 'ded'. [citation needed]
I'm 99.9% certain Nakamoto is alive ...
...
Not *Satire*
Danger Mouse - 99 Problems (2004) *NSFW*
- https://youtu.be/kxW6e1jgt5Q
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
And wrong format, don't have signature, Read here before sign message: Sign message format
This is how one actually signs and verifies a message in original Bitcoin (BTC) ...
Re: Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft [re: Craig Wright scam]
- https://brainwalletx.github.io/#verify?vrAddr=1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp&vrMsg=Project%20Anastasia%3A%20Bitcoiners%20Against%20Identity%20Theft%0A%0ACraig%20Wright%20is%20an%20identity%20thief%20who%20has%20taken%20the%20name%20Satoshi%20Nakamoto%20-%20prove%20me%20wrong!%0A%0AMy%20Old%20Wallet%20Address%3A%201JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp%20created%2015%2F02%2F2010%2015%3A20%0A%0AWhy%20can't%20Craig%20Wright%20do%20this%3F%20%0A%0AVerifying%20my%20(old)%20zero%20balance%20wallet%20address%20for%20blockchain%20research%20etc.%2C%0A%0A-%20https%3A%2F%2Fbitcointalk.org%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D4630066.0%0A%0ANot%20Your%20Private%20Keys%2C%20Not%20Your%20Bitcoin.%0A%0ADon't%20trust%2C%20verify.%0A%0ASigned%20by%20BitcoinFX%20-%20bitcointalk.org%20-%20January%206th%2C%202020&vrSig=G7%2FSRVNoiHQp0%2FhWWFBiKACp1OJfvytLudcp855eptMnZyvrGKymAdB98yrrHtV9H%2BjQvgpcmfcF1011bVUQHRI%3D
- https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
...
Whilst the identity theft of princess Anastasia is an excellent analogy, I have long thought that the 'Tichborne case' also provides a very fitting example to describe the actions of CSW ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tichborne_case a.k.a "The Tichborne Claimant"
"... the man who lost himself still walks in history, with no other name than that which the common voice of his day accorded him: the Claimant ..."
...
Furthermore, BSV is NOT Original Bitcoin. It is a fork of a fork (a copy of a copy) as described in the BSV license here:
- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE
Quote: "... The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined,
for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767
with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b" ..."
Comprende ?
Caveat emptor "buyer beware" BSV is NOT original Bitcoin. Bitcoin is BTC https://bitcoin.org
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
And please notice, the still anonymous developer of bitcoin is what made people really love it, who cares if we know your developer?
bannnnn
Yes 'ban' these charlatans ... BSV is NOT Bitcoin and CSW has categorically failed to produce any valid cryptographically assured evidence to date.
Is this your twitter account 'Bitcoin SV' ? I appears twitter thinks someone has been 'impersonating' the real Bitcoin (BTC) ...
Which would seem to be the case here ...
"Lulz."
- https://twitter.com/bennd77/status/1303660034971381760
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
If BSV is better then why CSW is trying so hard to prove he is satoshi Nakamoto?
Let me tell you something. If CSW is not Satoshi, let Satoshi show up and declare about it.Until then, Craig has the right to all claims
Craig claimed in court he owned a bunch of addresses ... turns out he does not own them and someone else in fact does ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5250960.0
The real satoshi would simply never say this ...
"Interviewer: "Hey Craig, how do you explain the 145 addressed that signed "Craig is a fraud" last week ?"
Craig: " No message was signed, you can't sign anonymously - you have to have an identity to sign....key don't count..I gotta go...be" 😂😂😂 "
https://twitter.com/BitcoinMemeHub/status/1268366834287312897
Source: REIMAGINE 2020 - Craig S. Wright - World Riots, Hard Work, Quantum Computing and more
- https://youtu.be/PHBrodzl5qY?t=5105
...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature
"A digital signature is a mathematical scheme for verifying the authenticity of digital messages or documents. A valid digital signature, where the prerequisites are satisfied, gives a recipient very strong reason to believe that the message was created by a known sender (authentication), and that the message was not altered in transit (integrity).
Digital signatures are a standard element of most cryptographic protocol suites, and are commonly used for software distribution, financial transactions, contract management software, and in other cases where it is important to detect forgery or tampering..."
...
Back to the OP ... 145 addresses were signed and the messages are 100% verifiable on the blockchain.
These are addresses that Craig Wright told the court he owned / mined, in the 4th revision of the Tulip Trust, which is supposedly inaccessible.
Valid Bitcoin messages can clearly be signed anonymously and no you don't have to have an identity for the message to be validated.
Moreover, the message does in fact contain an identity i.e. the anonymous address does NOT belong to Craig Wright.
The addresses could belong to anybody, but it categorically does not belong to Craig Wright.
Anyone who still thinks that 'Craig is Satoshi', based on this single piece of evidence alone, is a complete and utterly misguided fool.
"Interviewer: "Hey Craig, how do you explain the 145 addressed that signed "Craig is a fraud" last week ?"
Craig: " No message was signed, you can't sign anonymously - you have to have an identity to sign....key don't count..I gotta go...be" 😂😂😂 "
https://twitter.com/BitcoinMemeHub/status/1268366834287312897
Source: REIMAGINE 2020 - Craig S. Wright - World Riots, Hard Work, Quantum Computing and more
- https://youtu.be/PHBrodzl5qY?t=5105
...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature
"A digital signature is a mathematical scheme for verifying the authenticity of digital messages or documents. A valid digital signature, where the prerequisites are satisfied, gives a recipient very strong reason to believe that the message was created by a known sender (authentication), and that the message was not altered in transit (integrity).
Digital signatures are a standard element of most cryptographic protocol suites, and are commonly used for software distribution, financial transactions, contract management software, and in other cases where it is important to detect forgery or tampering..."
...
Back to the OP ... 145 addresses were signed and the messages are 100% verifiable on the blockchain.
These are addresses that Craig Wright told the court he owned / mined, in the 4th revision of the Tulip Trust, which is supposedly inaccessible.
Valid Bitcoin messages can clearly be signed anonymously and no you don't have to have an identity for the message to be validated.
Moreover, the message does in fact contain an identity i.e. the anonymous address does NOT belong to Craig Wright.
The addresses could belong to anybody, but it categorically does not belong to Craig Wright.
Anyone who still thinks that 'Craig is Satoshi', based on this single piece of evidence alone, is a complete and utterly misguided fool.
Care to explain this one? Plus all his other lies ...
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1280422503974928384
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5250960.msg54747021#msg54747021
Bitcoin = BTC
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
Pretty sure that's not how it works. Otherwise, if John Lennon doesn't turn up to prove otherwise, then I'm John Lennon. Please give me decades of backdated Beatles royalties because no one can prove I'm not John Lennon.
Lennon is dead, stupidSatoshi is not dead
Do you feel the difference?
Craig Wright is a fraud. Do you know the difference? - SWIM
Satoshi is 'ded'. [citation needed]
I'm 99.9% certain Nakamoto is alive ...
...
Danger Mouse - 99 Problems (2004) *NSFW*
- https://youtu.be/kxW6e1jgt5Q
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
After segwit BTC is not Bitcoin anymore! This is not Original Bitcoin!
Irony, You sign message Bitcoin segwit address.Code:
...snip...
most of payments are carried out in this currency
NothingThis is how one actually signs and verifies a message in original Bitcoin (BTC) ...
Re: Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft [re: Craig Wright scam]
Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft
Craig Wright is an identity thief who has taken the name Satoshi Nakamoto - prove me wrong!
My Old Wallet Address: 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp created 15/02/2010 15:20
Why can't Craig Wright do this?
Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0
Not Your Private Keys, Not Your Bitcoin.
Don't trust, verify.
Signed by BitcoinFX - bitcointalk.org - January 6th, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
G7/SRVNoiHQp0/hWWFBiKACp1OJfvytLudcp855eptMnZyvrGKymAdB98yrrHtV9H+jQvgpcmfcF1011bVUQHRI=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft
Craig Wright is an identity thief who has taken the name Satoshi Nakamoto - prove me wrong!
My Old Wallet Address: 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp created 15/02/2010 15:20
Why can't Craig Wright do this?
Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0
Not Your Private Keys, Not Your Bitcoin.
Don't trust, verify.
Signed by BitcoinFX - bitcointalk.org - January 6th, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
G7/SRVNoiHQp0/hWWFBiKACp1OJfvytLudcp855eptMnZyvrGKymAdB98yrrHtV9H+jQvgpcmfcF1011bVUQHRI=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- https://brainwalletx.github.io/#verify?vrAddr=1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp&vrMsg=Project%20Anastasia%3A%20Bitcoiners%20Against%20Identity%20Theft%0A%0ACraig%20Wright%20is%20an%20identity%20thief%20who%20has%20taken%20the%20name%20Satoshi%20Nakamoto%20-%20prove%20me%20wrong!%0A%0AMy%20Old%20Wallet%20Address%3A%201JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp%20created%2015%2F02%2F2010%2015%3A20%0A%0AWhy%20can't%20Craig%20Wright%20do%20this%3F%20%0A%0AVerifying%20my%20(old)%20zero%20balance%20wallet%20address%20for%20blockchain%20research%20etc.%2C%0A%0A-%20https%3A%2F%2Fbitcointalk.org%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D4630066.0%0A%0ANot%20Your%20Private%20Keys%2C%20Not%20Your%20Bitcoin.%0A%0ADon't%20trust%2C%20verify.%0A%0ASigned%20by%20BitcoinFX%20-%20bitcointalk.org%20-%20January%206th%2C%202020&vrSig=G7%2FSRVNoiHQp0%2FhWWFBiKACp1OJfvytLudcp855eptMnZyvrGKymAdB98yrrHtV9H%2BjQvgpcmfcF1011bVUQHRI%3D
- https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
...
Whilst the identity theft of princess Anastasia is an excellent analogy, I have long thought that the 'Tichborne case' also provides a very fitting example to describe the actions of CSW ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tichborne_case a.k.a "The Tichborne Claimant"
"... the man who lost himself still walks in history, with no other name than that which the common voice of his day accorded him: the Claimant ..."
...
...snip...
Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi.
Look at all this comprehensive research into his lies ...
The #faketoshi fraud timeline ...
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html
Satoshi ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.0
Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi.
Look at all this comprehensive research into his lies ...
The #faketoshi fraud timeline ...
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html
Satoshi ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.0
Furthermore, BSV is NOT Original Bitcoin. It is a fork of a fork (a copy of a copy) as described in the BSV license here:
- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE
Quote: "... The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined,
for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767
with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b" ..."
Comprende ?
Caveat emptor "buyer beware" BSV is NOT original Bitcoin. Bitcoin is BTC https://bitcoin.org