No, your memory is playing bad jokes with you. Let me clarify it to you: He used very controversial situation (the argument that i was tagged only by him, noone else tagged me. I will tell you a little more, at first bob123 tagged me about "cheating" but after strong proofs the removed his tag) to sort out with his opponent. Just like personal vendetta.
My feedback is about that this person is a liar, who accused people (not me, important moment) in strong sins without any proofs (just his "view"). So i think, that with such people, who can accuse you in stealing, "corruption" and so on, red trust feedback fit pretty well.
The only difference between me and Lauda is that Lauda tagged by himself people which accused him in "stealing/corruption/so on" while i tagged someone who accused third party.
Same shit, different shovel. Even now you can't keep it in your pants and need to bring up Lauda. Pathetic. Didn't you also tag marlboroza at one point for some idiotic reasons?
The point is, KTChampions presented a well-substantiated case against you. You didn't. Red trust for "lying" (unless it's lying in a trade) or "insulting" is red trust for opinion. Like red trust for disrespecting the law. If you can't reflect on your own actions... well, I still think you deserve bob123's leniency but your blow-up high horse is leaking badly.