Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: The Plagiarist, Ban Appeal and the Forum
by
DdmrDdmr
on 18/09/2020, 16:25:46 UTC
⭐ Merited by jademaxsuy (1)
A while back, I tried to roughly pinpoint when the rule on plagiarism was included in the unnoficial (quasi-oficial) forum’s ruleset. It turns out that it’s been around since around mid 2016 (see details in quote below). This does not discard that it was dealt with in some other manner before then, but that’s perhaps roughly the moment when it was present enough to summon the creation of the expedite rule number 33 …:

<…> I had the curiosity at some point last year as to how far back in people’s history did the rules apply (see A couple of quick questions related to forum rules). The answer was that there is no delimited timeframe for rules to apply.

If I recall correctly, my curiosity was aroused when I checked the forum rules to see when rule 33 had been written:

- It was present at round November 2016 (rule number 33): https://web.archive.org/web/20161121133329/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0
- But not in May 2016: https://web.archive.org/web/20160506061123/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

Of course, these rules are basically a privately applied based guideline, and obviously can apply to whatever timeframe the Forum wishes, with disregard to the fact that the rule infringement may have been committed prior to the rule being stated.

The fact that the rule on plagiarism (for example) seems not to have been introduced until somewhere between May and November 2016 could be controversial with regards people being banned for plagiarism committed before that period. On the other hand, we could understand that all rules are fully retroactive and that’s it. I personally would prefer a 3 year timeframe or so, but that’s all it is, a personal preference.