It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Mostly they make the hunters faulty in a reason that they don't care much of the tokens being sent to them but if it will be put in one piece mostly investors contribute much of the falling price if certain investors do have a weak hand.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.
I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.
The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.
Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!
As far as I could tell it isn't but hunters do have a choice where they'll join projects they think that has good pay. As per the distribution I think it was a little too harsh really, I've been on the same boat and still waiting if they'll ever distribute it, hoping the future of bounties is paid weekly or monthly.