It's very simple, Provide some solid proof that suchmoon is connected to betmoose so that people will take your accusation seriously. You are accusing a reputable person here without a proof that's why most of the post above is just a troll just like your thread which is full of threat about your alleged doxxing to suchmoon.
Just provide an info how you come up to the conclusion that suchmoon is an alts of betmoose then you might find support here with your claim. If you are just posting this thread to make revenge to suchmoon then you will be forever be ignore here in the forum.
This is a 2 way street.
If you must produce proof that is independently verifiable that stands up to scrutiny to make an accusation?
Then suchmoon must do the same.
Suchmoon makes accusations and refuses to provide any independently verifiable evidence that stands up to scrutiny aka proof either.
This must be a universal rule for all members.
You can not have double standards here or 2 sets of different rules.
Without independently verifiable evidence or proof to examine, you are just speculating or making a best guess.
There is some circumstances that would suggest this could be true. Suchmoon is quite possibly an alt of lauda. Lauda was given special treatment by FJ. Why? Some say lauda was involved with running that gambling site.
That is speculative but not as easy to disprove as suchmoons allegations against others.
If you claim making accusations without " proof" are trolling I could support that if it were universally enforced here but DT1 will reject that.