It is of no doubt that many investors detest bounty hunters as they usually attribute the fault of price fall and dump to them, instead of blaming the project teams that do not put things in place to make their projects stand out.
Today, the team equally treat the hunters wickedly as if they're beggars after the hunters have completed the tasks assigned to them.
I recently witnessed a bounty pool of $15,000 with a participants of around 2,000. The bounty bounty was first scheduled for 4 weeks and later extended to 20 without a dime added to the pool.
The hunters endure the hash condition to complete the project and the hunters' were still delayed for several months after the bounty ended. When the started to pay, just 20% was released extending the rest of the payment to over 9 months.
Despite all these, the token price is still not attractive. Are all these hash treatments meted on hunters worth it!
I have joined many good projects so far, each project realizes that when pioneering development it requires support in any way, including bounties to campaign globally on forums and social media, when the project reaches its peak they will thank the bounty hunter and will be paid for campaign services. The only reason a bad project would be to divert the price dump was because of the bounty hunter but to be honest the project's growth was not good.