Your coin choosing algorithms are a bit simple then if they are affected so much by pumps. 
Since you wrecked the coin and need at least 103 confirms before you can trade the coins I'm happy to see you're not going to make much money out of it anyway. Since wrecking the coin, prices are down as well. Block times are high since you left the remaining miners at a very high difficulty, high enough for them to walk away, so you're probably no where near those 103 confirms yet. For once I hope prices will drop further so you'll be left with worthless coins and maybe learn something out of it.
Then we've got a lot of room for improvement, which is awesome Since you wrecked the coin and need at least 103 confirms before you can trade the coins I'm happy to see you're not going to make much money out of it anyway. Since wrecking the coin, prices are down as well. Block times are high since you left the remaining miners at a very high difficulty, high enough for them to walk away, so you're probably no where near those 103 confirms yet. For once I hope prices will drop further so you'll be left with worthless coins and maybe learn something out of it.
Why don't you divide your 25GH/s hashing power a bit over multiple coins that can handle the load so your coin raping becomes a bit more sustainable?
Isn't this exactly what I said we did?If you don't your 'clients' will keep seeing lowering BTC/MH/day numbers everyday then I guess they'll go back to dedicated mining the coins they themselves believe in or stop mining in any way. Coin profit switching pools like Middlecoin, of which Wafflepool and Cleverming are identical copies are so 1.0, we need a 2.0 version of these types of pools and fortunately they're beginning to surface.
And I wish coinshift the best of luck (which I assume is who you're talking about). There's always room for improvement in anything internet related, and I really hope they do something really innovative, its awesome to see people doing neat new things. That said, I'm not sure exactly what neat things they're doing there, but their graphs are showing that they're mining with about 1/3 of their hashpower constantly Hopefully just a display issue (everyone knows we've had our fair share).On the other side, if you're truly concerned with how we're handling which coins we're mining, and how we assign hashpower, please do give meaningful suggestions (suggestions are way better than just "you screwed up" - I can tell when that happens, fixing things is the hard part). I feel I've been more than receptive to what people want here, and I'd love to hear any suggestions you've got. I've heard things from "Add smaller coins to eek out that last 1% of profits" and I've heard things like "too risky and it will add variance, stick to major coins/exchanges". Its tough to please everyone, but I'm trying my best