In order to be fair, some data, such as the forum has its 10th anniversary, must be excluded, because they are exceptional and did not occur due to high-quality posts.
The activity of the members must also be checked, but even after more than two years have passed, a large number of members have failed to obtain 1,000 merits, which is bad for discussions (quality of the posts)or because of the weakness of the merit system.

It's nice to see my name on some of these lists even though I haven't shared much of the topics lately.