The nineties called and wants their encryption wars back
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-and-public-safetyIn light of these threats, there is increasing consensus across governments and international institutions that action must be taken: while encryption is vital and privacy and cyber security must be protected, that should not come at the expense of wholly precluding law enforcement, and the tech industry itself, from being able to act against the most serious illegal content and activity online.
ruined my third Sunday nap
Embed the safety of the public in system designs, thereby enabling companies to act against illegal content and activity effectively with no reduction to safety, and facilitating the investigation and prosecution of offences and safeguarding the vulnerable;
Enable law enforcement access to content in a readable and usable format where an authorisation is lawfully issued, is necessary and proportionate, and is subject to strong safeguards and oversight; and
Engage in consultation with governments and other stakeholders to facilitate legal access in a way that is substantive and genuinely influences design decisions.
I like how they start with "It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people" but then talk about authorities having access. Who are the authorities in "repressive states" if not the ones doing the repressing ?