Ok, so you were paid to promote them,big difference.You were paid to promote airdrop of scam,you directly helped scammers to reach more people.That makes you scammer too.  Also,you said that all airdrops are verified,but how did you verified it if you promoted obvious scam?So KingCasino and ClipX were not only cases you promoted scams.



If it is ok to ask for positive review,why dont you have it in your bounties,or anyone else.For your articles and videos you just say make a review,you dont ask for positive review because this would look like getting paid for shilling.Shilling is unethical and dishonest.For your next bounty write that you ask for positive reviews and videos and we will see what happens.

Look what happened to someone that was selling fake reviews,he was tagged.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251616.0


Suchmoon,xenon131 and other dt members, is this enough evidence for flag on bountydetective?
[/quote]


First, it is weird a person using an alt account while he/she is mentioning about honesty and ethics. Unfortunately, some moderators are even deleting our "thank you" messages to the supporters. Still, they don't ban these kinds of prominent alt accounts or delete posts, which includes rude language and swear.

Secondly, every published airdrop is not paid. You have no idea about how airdrops work. Furthermore, yes, our airdrops are "verified." It means we don't share fake airdrops, which are not officially published by the project.
Although Airdrop Detective is off-topic for this thread, as everyone can see, we can make a countercharge against an accuser transparently and honestly, without using an alt account or trying to manipulate other users.

We are still wondering about the gangs' opinions about many exit scam projects' bounties promoted by some "legendary, hero airdrop managers" in this forum. Will you give all of those bounty managers a "negative trust" or is this something special to Bounty Detective?