[HELP] TRUST ABUSE BY PLAGIARIST / DT MEMBERS PLEASE HELP
Hi all,
I am reaching out to all DT members to please check my case:
A few days ago I gave a negative feedback to the user SiNeReiNZzz.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=251328
My feedback was based on this reason:
Of course, as Rikafip already noted, this is pure plagiarism. He copied entire sentences with some minor modifications. I highlighted the parts that are blatant copy/paste and the rest is partially spun.
Source: Innovation-Based Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects by Vladimir Litvinenko
Why is such a user in DT and not banned from the forum? SiNeReiNZzz is a plagiarist and I don't buy his excuses. He tried to clear up his post and added a source later on. Moreover he gave some lame excuse that he used the text some years back in university when he wrote an article about the topic. Obviously nobody was able to verify that and I don't believe him. See the archived post for full information.
For my feedback SiNeReiNZzz gave me a revenge feedback with is a obvious trust abuse. He is also insulting me:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2383451
My question to all DT members is: Why am I the person who is getting a negative feedback here? SiNeReiNZzz is a DT2 member and his feedback seems to count.
He clearly deserves to be out of the DT circle and a red trust for his plagiarism.
Dear DT members please help me on that case.
I am reaching out to all DT members to please check my case:
A few days ago I gave a negative feedback to the user SiNeReiNZzz.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=251328
My feedback was based on this reason:
Of course, as Rikafip already noted, this is pure plagiarism. He copied entire sentences with some minor modifications. I highlighted the parts that are blatant copy/paste and the rest is partially spun.
Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
In addition to data protection, for example, the implementation of the many legal sources that are particularly relevant to transport must be taken into account.
For example, the transport law framework conditions are relatively complex, because the legal cornerstones result from a complex interplay of modality-related conventions, the (controversial) rules of multimodal transport and the different national legal norms.
Furthermore, quasi-binding specifications of the lex mercatoria (e.g. ERA 600 or BIMCO bill of lading) must also be taken into account.
Moreover, such automated systems must be coordinated with the mandatory standards at national and international level (such as formal requirements or restrictions on liability for damages).
Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.
Archived: http://archive.is/MEOGwIn addition to data protection, for example, the implementation of the many legal sources that are particularly relevant to transport must be taken into account.
For example, the transport law framework conditions are relatively complex, because the legal cornerstones result from a complex interplay of modality-related conventions, the (controversial) rules of multimodal transport and the different national legal norms.
Furthermore, quasi-binding specifications of the lex mercatoria (e.g. ERA 600 or BIMCO bill of lading) must also be taken into account.
Moreover, such automated systems must be coordinated with the mandatory standards at national and international level (such as formal requirements or restrictions on liability for damages).
Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.
Source: Innovation-Based Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects by Vladimir Litvinenko
Why is such a user in DT and not banned from the forum? SiNeReiNZzz is a plagiarist and I don't buy his excuses. He tried to clear up his post and added a source later on. Moreover he gave some lame excuse that he used the text some years back in university when he wrote an article about the topic. Obviously nobody was able to verify that and I don't believe him. See the archived post for full information.
For my feedback SiNeReiNZzz gave me a revenge feedback with is a obvious trust abuse. He is also insulting me:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2383451
My question to all DT members is: Why am I the person who is getting a negative feedback here? SiNeReiNZzz is a DT2 member and his feedback seems to count.
He clearly deserves to be out of the DT circle and a red trust for his plagiarism.
Dear DT members please help me on that case.