>It's all a matter of prospective, a strong name does set a currency apart, contrary to popular belief.

I was agreeing with you, branding is everything in a market of a million virtually identical clones.

>Also I do not recall saying that the market was going to settle on only one coin, although it is possible.

I didn't say you said it, I said people say it, and I think it's bollox. There will never be a single crypto-currency, because it's opensource and anyone with any capital fiat or crypto based can launch and support a coin startup at any time they want.


>It's not going to happen in our lifetime, perhaps 2 or 3 generations when paper currency is completely removed from the equation we >will see a one currency market.

Not gonna happen, and even if it could it's not at all desirable. What's much more likely to happen is the launch of wallets which can hold any type of crypto, and website payment integration software which allows for merchants to accept any type of crypto. Exchanges will also eventually trade any crypto against any crypto.

>As for now the multitude of currencies flooding the market are both good and bad for the crypto world.

No it's only good, despite the whining complaints of selfish ignorant fools who throw the term "shitcoin" around constantly the moment a new startup fails to completely dominate the entire world... it's kinda pathetic tbh.

>In ways we could speculate until our fingers fall off, either way today even as we speak even more currencies are being released into >the wild wild world of alternative currencies some will have certain successes and failures as some will never make it to the exchanges.

Great, survival of the fittest, the best coins will spawn copies with further innovations, the weakest coins will fail, and that's a good thing too.

>Specifically based on the attention the coin receives. Marketing, investors and miners are what makes or breaks a coin.

Absolutely, like I said, technologically speaking there is very little to differentiate any crypto from any other, they are all variants on the same theme. Take DOGE, it's code is virtually a carbon copy of LTC, and yet because it had a funny cute name it gained a massive following overnight. The branding is what made that coin, not the technology. Conversely it's that silly name that will prevent the coin from ever being taken seriously by the mass market. They did get one thing right though; people do understand the larger volume much easier than fractions after a decimal place. I think in the long run 42 Coin has the best idea on that, all that needs to be done is hiding the decimal and just counting in "Dents".


>If I happened to have a delorean handy I would sell it, mostly because it's an ugly car also hard to find parts for. Not to mention >although time travel is also a work in progress somewhere in the universe, the children's movie you reference is nothing more than a >children's movie from the 80's.

No need to be pedantic it was just a figure of speech. Honestly a response like that makes me wonder if you have much of an active social life.



>On the other hand I do see your point and happen to agree with it, my advice to you is to use your technical skills to implement your >coins before your good idea's become a relic to you and a reality to another.

I wasn't soliciting your advice, thank you.

>You say you don't have the time, that almost makes it seem as if you have a lack of faith in your own product. Procrastination is the foundation of failure!

Nah, I just have rent and bills to pay. I'm getting married in a couple of weeks time, busy busy busy.



>Good luck with your 3 or 4 coins, forgive my lack of interest in them sound's like a pump and dump operation in my opinion.

No no no, 3 or 4 brand names for global autonomous corporation startups.

I've told you nothing at all really about my ideas, and yet you've already jumped to the conclusion that I'm a lazy procrastinating pump and dump scam artist... rightly or wrongly, your stance does nothing but suggest to me a huge amount about you, your level of maturity, your attitude to the market and competitors and your delusions of grandeur over having thought of some clever marketing ploy for what ultimately is a product which will be virtually identical to everything else out there.

Now if you had a real clever idea, like Etherium, you'd be bursting to tell everyone about it, but no, all you have is a concept and your desperately trying to get people to help you become rich off it.



>I suggest you pick the best name and stick with it rather than trying to start so many.


Nah, it's perfectly possible to launch and effectively maintain a portfolio of crypto-corporations, they are a lot less work to maintain than a real life corporation because of their distributed autonomous collective nature.


>It will make all the difference in the world unless you are doing it only for personal gain.

That's a completely unfounded assertion which I suspect you will offer no backing for.