I strongly advise that you hire a competent attorney to defend you.
Because you haven’t even the slightest idea about how even to read a statute within its four corners, let alone how to navigate the complexities of the law. Also, by the way, actual lawyers hate Wikipedia legal arguments; be guided accordingly.
One shouldn't conclude from oneself to others. Nullius' argumentation lacks basic legal knowledge, not to mention concrete legislative text, law commentaries or highest judicial jurisdiction. Since he has run out of arguments he throws around with wortless smoke candles. The typical behavior of legal laymen. BTW, the Arkansas Code has not been cited from Wikipedia. But the general public thanks him for revealing that he failed with his amateurish interpretation of the law. Backing it up with ridiculous graphics doesn't make the whole thing better.