WHen I overclock to 200 I get TONS of hardware errors. But at 375 I get about 195 GH/S and no errors. Interesting.
I have another unit running at stock that gets thousands of hardware errors and runs about 2 degrees hotter than the others. Any ideas? Its green LED is also very weak compared to the bright green LED on my other units.
Definitly some units handle the overclock better than others. Diference in the green LED? Prolly just component variance.
I own 6 and they dont all display the exact same green tone. Some brighter, some darker.
Other threads claim that if the error rate is below 2%, your fine. Have you done your math?
Cheers
quick calc (not the official formula but good enough) HW/DiffA= less than .02 you're good.
I can make that file and script for 393.5MHz, but I just need to look at the value. I'm not comfortable recommending it, as I haven't tested it myself, but maybe if it's good, I'll switch to it, also. Thing is 400MHz is getting me over 200GH/s (202GH/s+ on 1 Ant and 204GH/s+ on the other Ant)
I'm making a script for another forum member for --load-balance so I'm uploading 2 files to dropbox so I'll just make it 3 files
Brb...