The question to all DT members, whether it is better to keep Lauda on DT selection or we should remove her from there?
What if someone, negatively tagged by Lauda give us a rational explanation here that feedback is wrongly left. Such cases remain without the possibility of revision.
on the other hand, she left many proper feedbacks and it would unfairly go to "untrusted feedbacks".
Good point. Her feedback is excellent, but unmaintained. It is not only a matter of mistakes: She has sometimes amended her feedback (
sometimes spectacularly) based on new developments or new information.
But her tags are necessary. Does anyone in DT want to go through her terrifically huge sent feedback list, evaluate each case, and copy feedbacks where appropriate? Remember the “Prison Break” thread?
(For my part, I will keep Lauda in my personal trust list. But I gave up on DT awhile ago; the system is broken by design, just basically democracy as I said long ago.)