There really is no more point in discussing it because you simply lack the proper understand of how bitcoin works.  It doesn't work the way you think it does and you can't fix something you don't understand.

I will leave you wish
a) SPV clients have copy of all block headers

b) there is no such thing as "balances" at an address.  Bitcoin works on the concept of inputs and outputs.

c) you say you will "carry forward" the balance into a new block but what happens when an attacker simply publishes a chain which contains unspent outputs that nobody has the historical records to validate anymore.  can you say unlimited minting?  With the current trust model an attacker with >51% hashrate is limited in what they can do.  Under your system they could simply extend the blockchain far enough that most nodes no longer have the historical records to validate a "old" tx placed in a new block ever existed.  The attacker could destroy Bitcoin through unauthorized minting.  

d) "The transactions containing them can simply be moved automatically according to some strict rules that I don't care enough to come up with"  That is why you have no proposal.  "Um yeah we can do this stuff but it will require some stuff but I don't really fill like saying the stuff but if you don't agree with me you are jerks and just trolling.  We can fill in the stuff later and stuff."

I won't be responding again, you can't provide a proposal when you can't even speak the language.   At appeared at one time you were interested in actually learning how Bitcoin really works but that is obviously not the case.  If you have no interesting in actually learning how the system you are trying to "fix" works then don't be surprised when nobody takes you seriously.