See the pain.. BSV must depend on a single bad aussie s case....
But BitCoin is greater than just that, or a ticker, hodled by some anarcho sales
Is it anti fragile? So it is robust at least, so don't fiddle around with it
BitCoin follows rules, and most are just existing legal ones, the contract that was set up in its birth
Change that and you got some exposure
Do your own research and don't trust (esp proof of twitter, repeating the same crap all the time)
But BitCoin is greater than just that, or a ticker, hodled by some anarcho sales
Is it anti fragile? So it is robust at least, so don't fiddle around with it
BitCoin follows rules, and most are just existing legal ones, the contract that was set up in its birth
Change that and you got some exposure
Do your own research and don't trust (esp proof of twitter, repeating the same crap all the time)
Ironically, the very person who told you what Bitcoin is/was is likely the very same person being referred to by the Judge in the above court documents.
BSV contravenes General Data Protection Regulation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation EU laws on data storage, and that's just for starters. Your from Germany right, hv_ ?
Again, BSV is NOT Bitcoin and Craig Wright is NOT satoshi.
People who forked BSV lied to you and if you think BSV is Bitcoin you fell for the lie.
Bitcoin is BTC.
I think you know I did more research than you on this very subject.
Try trusting cryptographically assured proof next time and not just hearsay.
