In the end, the hacker only giving hard time to both charity organization and The Giving Block with various legal problem such as making documentation about the incident and process of returning the Bitcoin to the victim through government.
A donation is still a donation imo, whether it be for the purpose of fame or fun. Let's be real, how many politicians actually donate out of the kindness of their hearts right? That's why it's probably stupid to judge a donation based on what the motives are, a donation is still a donation imo, which can still prove to be helpful for those that are in need.
The main difference is legality, i doubt any charity organization think risk of closed by government is worth it.