nullius tags for trolling discussion - revmoved content from off-topic thread
Copying the off-topic responses from the other topic. For my response please jump to the next post:
For someone all of a sudden hero worshiping @Lauda you're biting the hand that feeds given Royse777 only just removed their distrust of @Lauda
... (and you're playing @Vod and @OgNasty against each-other as evidenced in the two links you provided) ...
Only someone dump would believe in whatever nullius is trying to troll recently. He has biased and poor judgement in all and it is clear to most of the users around here now. His trust abuse should just be handled by wise DT users by distrusting him (~nullius).
For someone all of a sudden hero worshiping @Lauda
LOLWUT. Are you both blind and mentally retarded? I have been consistently heroine-worshipping Lauda for years! Creating Lauda stories, Lauda fan art, Lauda satires, Lauda catbat witch memes and Lauda+Terminator memes... “All of a sudden”?
eddie13, I hope you don’t mind if I cherry-pick a salutary quote from you here:
[...]
[3] Man you talk about lauda an awfull lot..
http://HowManyTimesHasNulliusPostedLaudaToday.tk/ ??
lol 68 hits
“Hand that feeds”? How the fuck could Royse777 have any practical effect on either me or Lauda?
Oh, yes: You, a well-known deranged troll, live in a delusional fantasy that DT must be somehow important to me.
Lauda is “banned in the same way as satoshi”, in case you didn’t notice. And the suggestion that anybody here is “the hand that feeds” her is conceited and disgusting. Fuck you.
Smart people will arguably keep including her, so as to keep seeing her valuable tags. (Lack of maintenance is a problem, but I think that’s outweighed by the amount of real trouble prevented by Lauda’s tags.) For my part, I think that anyone who distrusts Lauda is too stupid to be worth worrying about.
Mr Nasty is a well-known trust abuser.
Thanks for that sage advice.
Your opinions as a butthurt professional spam-supporter and plagiarist are duly noted, and filed in “taken under advisement”. 🗑️
Back on topic—the point that Timelord evaded:
Only someone dump would believe in whatever nullius is trying to troll recently. He has biased and poor judgement in all and it is clear to most of the users around here now. His trust abuse should just be handled by wise DT users by distrusting him (~nullius).
How true it is as evidenced by this:
Please stop derailing the discussion with irrelevant nonsense that wholly evades the substance of the matter. Thanks.
Royse777 just felt like he needed to make some changes in his trust list and reconcile with some members after a disagreement that happened a sometime ago. I don't think by doing such, it means he has exceedingly poor judgment. It's not like he has already added Vod under his trustlist, but, even if he did so, it's his Custom trust list.
I don't have vod on my distrust list, does it mean I support him?
Most of these disagreements happen on a personal level and a number of people start distrusting each other because of difference in opinions. It doesn't mean everyone should join in and distrust that person just because they don't agree with you.
logfiles, how could you get the completely backwards idea that I be against Vod here? (!) Please review again the links that you quoted. You may also review my trust page, both sent and received feedback.
I agree with Vod’s accusation that OgNasty is a trust abuser (plus a scammer, a troll, etc.). My trust list has contained ~OgNasty ever since I made my very first custom trust list in early 2018, long before democratic DT even existed! And a few days ago, I issued negative trust feedback to Mr Nasty, which I should have done long ago.
Royse777 was defending OgNasty against me, in a way that shows peculiarly poor judgment. I have excluded Royse777 accordingly: I would not trust his tags, and I certainly would not trust his inclusions and exclusions to be brought into my trust network.
I addressed this here, because I could not reply to to Royse in Mr Nasty’s locked thread; and given what this whole episode shows about Royse’s own judgment, I need not reach the arguments that he thereby raised.
Sorry Timelord2067, hacker1001101001 and logfiles. I did not mean any harm. I wanted to move all the discussion in this new topic since everything responding the first post made by nullius is kinda off-topic for that thread. I hope you understand.
https://ninjastic.space/topic/5282543
Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.)
Please be advised that I will exclude you accordingly; and I suggest that others consider the soundness of your judgment here.
Since I cannot reasonably reply to you in a locked thread where my posts are deleted, and it is anyway not worth my time, all I have to say to your last reply to me thereby is that I know perfectly well how the trust system works; and I do not need your lecture.
https://ninjastic.space/post/55420395Please be advised that I will exclude you accordingly; and I suggest that others consider the soundness of your judgment here.
Since I cannot reasonably reply to you in a locked thread where my posts are deleted, and it is anyway not worth my time, all I have to say to your last reply to me thereby is that I know perfectly well how the trust system works; and I do not need your lecture.
Now, [Mr Nasty,] I have posted this here in the knowledge that since you are accusing me, deleting my post would be what you would call a “bitch move”. You are already whining like a bitch. Don’t make it any worse, now.
...
For someone all of a sudden hero worshiping @Lauda you're biting the hand that feeds given Royse777 only just removed their distrust of @Lauda
... (and you're playing @Vod and @OgNasty against each-other as evidenced in the two links you provided) ...
...
... (and you're playing @Vod and @OgNasty against each-other as evidenced in the two links you provided) ...Only someone dump would believe in whatever nullius is trying to troll recently. He has biased and poor judgement in all and it is clear to most of the users around here now. His trust abuse should just be handled by wise DT users by distrusting him (~nullius).
...
For someone all of a sudden hero worshiping @Lauda
LOLWUT. Are you both blind and mentally retarded? I have been consistently heroine-worshipping Lauda for years! Creating Lauda stories, Lauda fan art, Lauda satires, Lauda catbat witch memes and Lauda+Terminator memes... “All of a sudden”?
eddie13, I hope you don’t mind if I cherry-pick a salutary quote from you here:
[...]
Lauda
Lauda
Lauda [3]
Lauda
Lauda
Lauda
Lauda [3]
Lauda
[...]
[3] Man you talk about lauda an awfull lot..
http://HowManyTimesHasNulliusPostedLaudaToday.tk/ ??
lol 68 hits
you're biting the hand that feeds given Royse777 only just removed their distrust of @Lauda
“Hand that feeds”? How the fuck could Royse777 have any practical effect on either me or Lauda?
Oh, yes: You, a well-known deranged troll, live in a delusional fantasy that DT must be somehow important to me.
Lauda is “banned in the same way as satoshi”, in case you didn’t notice. And the suggestion that anybody here is “the hand that feeds” her is conceited and disgusting. Fuck you.
Smart people will arguably keep including her, so as to keep seeing her valuable tags. (Lack of maintenance is a problem, but I think that’s outweighed by the amount of real trouble prevented by Lauda’s tags.) For my part, I think that anyone who distrusts Lauda is too stupid to be worth worrying about.
... (and you're playing @Vod and @OgNasty against each-other as evidenced in the two links you provided) ...
Mr Nasty is a well-known trust abuser.
Only someone dump
Thanks for that sage advice.
Your opinions as a butthurt professional spam-supporter and plagiarist are duly noted, and filed in “taken under advisement”. 🗑️
Back on topic—the point that Timelord evaded:
Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.)
...
... (and you're playing @Vod and @OgNasty against each-other as evidenced in the two links you provided) ...Only someone dump would believe in whatever nullius is trying to troll recently. He has biased and poor judgement in all and it is clear to most of the users around here now. His trust abuse should just be handled by wise DT users by distrusting him (~nullius).
How true it is as evidenced by this:
... hyperventilating ...
... hyperventilating ...
Please stop derailing the discussion with irrelevant nonsense that wholly evades the substance of the matter. Thanks.
Back on topic—the point that Timelord evaded:
Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.)
Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.)
I don't get it, how is removing a member from one's distrust list equal to one supporting the previously distrusted member? Royse777 just felt like he needed to make some changes in his trust list and reconcile with some members after a disagreement that happened a sometime ago. I don't think by doing such, it means he has exceedingly poor judgment. It's not like he has already added Vod under his trustlist, but, even if he did so, it's his Custom trust list.
I don't have vod on my distrust list, does it mean I support him?
Most of these disagreements happen on a personal level and a number of people start distrusting each other because of difference in opinions. It doesn't mean everyone should join in and distrust that person just because they don't agree with you.
I don't get it, how is removing a member from one's distrust list equal to one supporting the previously distrusted member?
Royse777 just felt like he needed to make some changes in his trust list and reconcile with some members after a disagreement that happened a sometime ago. I don't think by doing such, it means he has exceedingly poor judgment. It's not like he has already added Vod under his trustlist, but, even if he did so, it's his Custom trust list.
Royse777 just felt like he needed to make some changes in his trust list and reconcile with some members after a disagreement that happened a sometime ago. I don't think by doing such, it means he has exceedingly poor judgment. It's not like he has already added Vod under his trustlist, but, even if he did so, it's his Custom trust list.
logfiles, how could you get the completely backwards idea that I be against Vod here? (!) Please review again the links that you quoted. You may also review my trust page, both sent and received feedback.
I agree with Vod’s accusation that OgNasty is a trust abuser (plus a scammer, a troll, etc.). My trust list has contained ~OgNasty ever since I made my very first custom trust list in early 2018, long before democratic DT even existed! And a few days ago, I issued negative trust feedback to Mr Nasty, which I should have done long ago.
Royse777 was defending OgNasty against me, in a way that shows peculiarly poor judgment. I have excluded Royse777 accordingly: I would not trust his tags, and I certainly would not trust his inclusions and exclusions to be brought into my trust network.
I addressed this here, because I could not reply to to Royse in Mr Nasty’s locked thread; and given what this whole episode shows about Royse’s own judgment, I need not reach the arguments that he thereby raised.
Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.)
Sorry Timelord2067, hacker1001101001 and logfiles. I did not mean any harm. I wanted to move all the discussion in this new topic since everything responding the first post made by nullius is kinda off-topic for that thread. I hope you understand.
https://ninjastic.space/topic/5282543