Check my feedback history; I have issued a number of troll tags, going back to February of 2018, plus other tags that you may find disagreeable. If you do not want to see my tags, that is what exclusions are for.
I'd never looked at your trust page before, just did, and the forum's stance on how the trust system should be used has changed a lot since 2018. If you don't believe me, just ask Theymos.
See
theymos' intent on trust Ratings, Flags and lists:
The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.
Why would I care about DT?
I can think of a reason: DT can be used for good and evil! I like to (think I) use it for good, and ever since OgNasty put me on DT (before the current system with voting for DT1), I started leaving more negative tags on scammers (to warn people).
It’s an Internet forum. Not a kingdom. My life does not revolve around it; I could leave tomorrow, not look back, and be better off for it. Some perspective is in order.
People take things they read online way too seriously

Fuck you Pharmacist.
And you as well. But just FYI, I was commenting more on the nature of the negative nullius left rather than whether it's accurate or not. Negging members for scamming is proper; giving negs to trolls is not.
For what it's worth: this is how I interpreted
The Pharmacists posts too.
you've got thin skin.
This is a part I really don't get: why would you care what anyone says about you online,
especially if you don't value their judgement? If it's someone you trust and who's opinion you value, it might be worth considering what they said. Other than that:
If someone on the internet is mean to you:
boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them.
About tagging trolls: this should be handled by the forum rules, not through the feedback system:
3. No trolling.
If you really hate someone and he's a terrible troll, that does not deserve negative feedback.