Re: nullius tags for trolling discussion - revmoved content from off-topic thread
Nulli buddie...
Are you trying to make enemies out of everyone?
Are you trying to make enemies out of everyone?
Not quite. Not just that I never had any beef with nullius (that shouldn't even be stated; I did it for outlining the obvious), but the contrary: I always had very intelligent discussion with nullius, on various fields - from history to ancient poets to ancient languages. I consider that we always had constructive, intelligent discussion, each learning from the other, in a respectful manner. Curiously, we never argued. And I say curiously because even similar minds think differently at some points. Oh well, curiously, it didn't happen. We learned from each other in the debated subjects (maybe I learned more from him than he learned from me), but the point is that we always talked politely to each other and it was constructive as we both learned new things in life.
I consider myself as a cultured person, which read thousands of books in his life, in various domains; yet, nullius proved himself an even more educated (cultured) person and this is not something I say on a
* nullius slaps himself with a large trout.
Isn't that a mIRC expression? It made me laugh remembering the old, good, mIRC times
Nobody who is objective really cares if you had a beef with a proven double standards scammer supporter and provable trust abuse like nullius.
The facts remain
1. Nullius had been caught out defending proven scammers multiple times.
2. Nullius had been caught out pushing clear double standards.
3. Nullius is a creepy sad obsessed old perv who chases members he thinks are female and gets weird about them.
4. Nullius is calling the OG a troll for correctly recognising lauda was a piece of dirty scamming shit
5. Nullius also supports other proven scammers here.
I challenge you to successfully refute these claims.
You won't because it is impossible.
Your anecdotal experience with nullius should not mean you don't have an issue with him if you cant refute the above points.
If you're suggesting it does then you are high risk.
There is no point nullius asking people if they agree with his bogus assessment that I or other members are trolls aka presenting provably and conclusively debunked information as true when you can not find any such examples.
Nullius has zero credibility from an objective assessment since he deliberately pushes double standards , protects scammers and is a disgusting obsessed creepy old perv with blue balls and no willing cyber sex partners here or anywhere else on the globe despite trying to impress them with his latin and nerdy computer skills.
Poor sad old fool is someone I would usually pity and be kind to. As you know I'm a very kind and caring type defending the underdog and bullied wherever I can. I would take this sad lonely demented old turd under my wing but since he's so terribly abusing the trust system and honest members here I will not even consider being kind to him until he starts to redeem himself.
The obsession with this scammer lauda and propensity to lash out with misuse of the vulnerable trust system must be pointed out when it is on topic and relevant.
I mean it is completely insane to label the forums warden who just returned 10M ( at one point ) funds a scammer with no conclusive proof at all is ludicrous. To label people trolls for posting or making comments that are easily demonstrated to be based on truth is equally as dangerous and devalues the warnings others genuinely leave.
Nullius is provably abusing the trust system. There is only one way you can prove abuse of this new shit tagging system and that is clear double standards. That is clear dishonesty. He has without doubt demonstrate how dishonest he is.
I challenge any member to refute this successfully in public right now.
Of course it will not happen.
The pompous studious turds trying to sound all cultured and well educated are always peasant plebs that are easily pulled apart in debate. I find this time and time again. They turn to books in mommas basement while the rest of us are banging hot babes and enjoying life. Girls although generally annoying twats and never all that clued up do seem to have an unexplained detection system for such beta losers and never want them when they are young and healthy. This always leads to this sad state we see nullius is left in now.
The sort of sad cunt that corrects your spelling and grammar for free, when you don't give a shit about it.
Hammer it out in 5 mins and let them have it dirty. If they cant glean the obvious meaning without a lot of fuss and ceremony even better.
Since he is such a sad case and has no care for debasing himself over a scammer that played on his obvious vulnerabilities would go easy on him in future if he shuts the fuck up crying about the scammer lauda and stops being so pretentious and pathetic. Man up you pathetic old gimp. I will make a real man out of you yet. Change your ways before I decide you've past the point of no return like some here. Once that happens I will use the truth when it is on topic and relevant to see you never get to enjoy posting free of the taint of your past. I'll even perhaps pay suchmoon to give you some cyber sex now and then.
Meta and rep are at the mercy of........... the independently verifiable truth. That is not something you can defeat.
There is no peace for those that seek to punish the presentation of the truth.
Accept the truth and move on.
Also remove all of your past trust abuse. That goes for all trust abusers.
No point people moaning there is no peace.
Let someone steal your house, car, good name, etc then others whining why cant you guys get along.
No, fuck off. No peace until things are put right.
Easy for those that are not unfairly treated to demand peace and harmony.
He's a provable trust abuser, that is indisputable. You don't have a beef with that then fine.
I would say advertising that is going to historically be a mistake long term.