-snip- saya gak tahu Apakah mereka tidak paham menggunakan quote atau mereka malas mengedit postingannya.
Bisa jadi demikian, atau bisa juga belum membaca rules yang dicantumkan om mod pada di sticky post:
Aturan tambahan:
- Pembuat thread diharapkan mengaktifkan fitur self-moderation dan memoderasi thread yang dibuatnya dari spam, low quality post, quote pyramid, etc.
Terkait hukuman plagiat, apakah Ada lencana di akunnya contohnya di forum ALTS ada lencana plagiarism Oleh akun yang bersangkutan, Apakah hal ini juga ada? Atau hanya mendapatkan trust negatif?
Tidak ada lencana/badge atau tanda apapun pada akunnya.
Trust positif/negatif sepengetahuan saya pada dasarnya diberikan bukan untuk kasus plagiarism dan semisalnya, tapi lebih ke kasus jual beli dan pinjam-meminjam.
I do not view it as appropriate for trust ratings to relate primarily to non-trust matters. By giving someone negative trust, you're basically attaching a note to all of their posts telling people "warning: do not trade with this person!". If we can get DT working well enough, in the future I'd like to prevent guests from even viewing topics by negative-trust users in trust-enabled sections, so you have to ask yourself whether your negative trust would warrant this sort of significant effect.
In particular, in my view:
- Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it.
- Giving negative trust for merit trading and deceptive alt-account use may be appropriate, but you should use a light touch so that people don't feel paranoid.
- You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again.
- It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. -snip-