Not disputing that.

Indeed that is why my list for accepting proof of the satoshi identity (cyrptographically) has five different points of empirical evidence.
well, Satoshi's key is in the repo for bitcoin.org:
https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/blob/master/satoshinakamoto.ascbut not on the actual
https://bitcoin.org website (maybe try to see if it's on the sitemap for bitcoin.org? I guess if it's in the repo, then the file _is_ somewhere on the website)
for historical purposes, isn't that enough? Satoshi doesn't work on Bitcoin now, so really that part of Bitcoin's story is just that: an old part of the story
Again, the point is the PGP Key is NOT (currently) where satoshi left it.
You know that satoshi does not work on Bitcoin still as a matter of fact do you?
It is entirely unacceptable and despicable that this PGP Key was ever 'removed' from bitcoin.org
When folks like Craig Wright are actively trying to re-write a fake historical narrative of Bitcoin creation ...
- hxxps://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/satoshi-never-posted-on-bitcointalk/
Bitcoin is not a story. It is a hard reality. Fact.
Do you not choose cryptographically assured proof over and above a story?
That is all.