Agreed. But every individual, or every perspective within an individual, or every different ideology, puts different weights on these and other values. There is the knowledge aspect, such as scientific predictions of extinction events or the feasibility of colonizing other planets or religious dogma (such as believing that apocalypse should not be avoided). There are also values used to decide, based on this knowledge, what the best outcome is for the will to realize itself. For instance, some people would prefer dying over living in pain. Entire populations probably wouldn't, but it's not something we can predict.
I think you going way to far with you problems.
TZM advocates resource based
economy not a rigged enforced way of life .
You know economy
like producing food and shit and managing resources , you are again falling into a trap way o thinking , if you dont know everything you cant do anything
Right now we face the same exact problems , i think in current paradigm where actually
money is making decisions for us we have much less freedoms then we could have.
My comment wasn't directly about RBE, you are taking it out of context. I like the RBE concept. My objections are against scientism and related fallacies, which mainly boil down to the is-ought problem.
Plus, my objections start after assuming we knew enough. Don't even get me started about what we actually know.