We look forward to having the opportunity share the enormous amount of evidence of fraud we have with any and all third party mediators. One would think that would be the best use of time for a legitimate player, rather than arguing in a forum, since if he is found legitimate, then he gets money. But he already knows the what the result will be.
my time is not of your concern.
I read it as a polite way of saying, “Put up or shut up.”
—Or, “put your mouth where your money is.” Which isn’t here, per the highlighted portion.
If you have a legitimate reason for avoiding third-party mediation, then that would be interesting. Do you?
As i promised you in the beginning, i will not let it go. For now, you accused me of scam and you taken action - blocked my BTC, so i think it is only fair for me also to take action, as i feel i am the one being scammed by you here.
So taking action i will. I will make sure that as many people as possible will know about your scamming practices. What is interesting is why you worry about it and my spending time doing it. If you are not scamming me, you have nothing to worry about

That kind of a threat would be much more meaningful if you went through all that mediation stuff—and
then Betcoin.AG refused to return the money, after a neutral third party found that Betcoin.AG lacked sufficient evidence of your multi-accounting.
Oh, wait—what didn’t happen, now did it?
To be clear, I am neutral here. I have no financial interest in Betcoin.AG, or anybody else here; I don’t know anything about Betcoin.AG. I just don’t think that it is looking very good for you here, to promise to
make lots of noise on the Internet when you have already been offered a productive means of resolving the matter. Indeed, it sounds to me more like a promise to wage a smear campaign. “;)”