In my opinion it is not in itself a strange idea to engage a mediator. Then in a fair way; that is to say, then the player also has the right to see all the evidence here. It's his own account, so he has the right for this.
The reason they provide now that they do not want to give the information because they are afraid he will cheat again is not a common and valuable argument.
If he did something wrong, and you can proof this, then it is easily to close the case and then Betcoin is absolutely in his right.
The reason they provide now that they do not want to give the information because they are afraid he will cheat again is not a common and valuable argument.
If he did something wrong, and you can proof this, then it is easily to close the case and then Betcoin is absolutely in his right.
There is no point in doing this, are you even reading what you are writing before you hit "Post"? I mean honestly, I know most of you have a grudge against gambling sites and that's the only reason you are posting here but try and apply some logic and think before you post.
I already wondered why you are reacting so aggressively and defending Betcoin, but since you are their campaign leader, that explains a lot.
You are not objective and are purely subjective to defend Betcoin. You run many campaigns, and that is the reason why you always defend your Casinos.
