A couple of things here:
- Red trust for plagiarism is probably unnecessary unless it involves something else that is scammy - e.g. shitbumping scams with plagiarized content. Plagiarism should be reported to moderators.
- You have more examples of plagiarism in your post history than just the ones pointed out by WhiteManWhite. Indirect references through your blog may not be enough. If a moderator can't see the reference in your post - you'll get into trouble sooner or later.
When you see nullius now defending copyright or plagiarism you can smell icopress is either lauda or nullius alt.
Icopress himself uses the trust system for personal vendetta. I posted on his shitty awards thread and he then gave me a red tag for... being on peoples ignore lists? Lol
Then comes crying someone else has correctly noticed he is using on many many different occasions many many examples of other peoples work with no references at all. These were not intended for his use or purpose.
So he is a hypocrite and pathetic cry baby duplicitous weasel who looks shady and by his own standards clearly meets the threshold for red trust.
If you see nullius defending someone that is usually the gold standard to tell if they are dangerous and high risk.
I suspect this icopress is lauda or nullius. Look at his prior posts they stink of lauda.
He deserves red tags by his own standards of giving them out.
Let him live by his own standards.