It still seems incoherent to me to say that masternode rewards eat up core capital in the long run.

This is a pyramid scam, as is the monetary printing without compensation to cover holes or debt that cannot be paid with real value (labor, raw materials, territories ...)

If, for example, the DIF invests its capital in gold, or in a specific company, do they tell me that this does not generate value over the native token of the Dash chain?

If I can use master nodes to speed up the network, or privatize a fund transfer, does this not add value to the network?

If there are more and more masternodes, does this mean that people are stupid and put their funds in a pyramid scam to end up being worth 0?

I get the impression that some come here to repeat the same thing a thousand times, and they endorse it in the general drop in the price of many projects, not in their concrete achievements.

What is clear is that Dash is increasing its use in a very slow way, and the demand for real use, compared to other tokens such as ETH, or BTC is minimal, and this is because it is not necessary to use it in a "mandatory way. "to obtain a specific purpose.

I can use BCH, BSV, Monero, XRP, DGB ... to do almost the same thing, in a similar way.

If the future of Dash is not to make a clear difference in its use, it will be just one more chain with its fans, but it will not go beyond that.

There are a thousand shades of gray in the universe, but only one black, if Dash agrees to be just another gray, he will end up cornered in the egg.


a greeting