I don't understand why you need to do that. Your posts would have the same value if you fully attributed the source and didn't try to hide it.
Thanks for your reply, you have a good viewing angle.
But all people, it seems to me, subconsciously perceive others, through the prism of their own personality and their thinking,
(and I am no exception). So I logically assumed that the reader can understand that these quoted headings are interrelated and have subordinate text. Anyway, I think the question has run its course, as the incorrect citation form has been corrected
(although I'll probably go over the post history again).
As for the images, it seemed to me that everything is obvious here, given that these are fairly well-known images from different parts of the world. Not to mention that it was all posted on the "Wall Observer". And you pointed out correctly ... that I pointed out that this is a collection of images from my blog
(all three parts are positioned as a single whole, and also include not only photographs of Dietmar.). And the blog is listed as the source from where these photos were mainly imported
(some remained).