Why is everyone talking about scamming being respective and subjected to red trust on a user, i have seen several users on the forum (name not to be mentioned) having red trust because of indecent/inappropriate accusations on other member without proof, this sound something like a rebel, that results to that user getting red trust by DT1, DT2, ......members, and that's something to avoid to enable oneself in joining campaigns. Its always stated by BM & CM never to allow such users to participate in their campaigns so as to maintain their good reputations throughout.
Can you point to some of those specifically
Show me examples.
Specific details.
I can show you the exact opposite.
I mean if you say something is happening but wont bring conclusive proof of highly corroborating evidence that is the same thing really you are talking about others doing.
I'm not sure if speculating on others is worthy of red trust if they cant conclusively debunk it especially concerning behaviors apparently conducted on the forum.
See Red trust made just to flag out people for their suspicious activity in the group so that other members in the forum get alert/caution while doing any transaction or deal with them.
Signature campaign or bounty managers start filtering the best out of many by dropping red trust people application. Then slowly, It becomes the guidelines(rule) for campaigns that red trust members are not allowed to participate in it.
Now as Lordhermes said there are various incidents that happened in past where people are got red trust just for silly reasons just to destroy their profile(or campaign income) on Forum.
I personally feel that we should use this weapon very carefully and give red trust after giving at least 1 warning to a member.