If we base crypto on the performance of a country then what is the point of it being decentralized in the first place.
That's right! what's the sense of being decentralized if it's relying with someone's economy or we can call it leadership. Crypto industry
still eisting without any regualtions it's best to keep that way.
I do not think that a government administration would have that much influence in cryptocurrency unless it is a CBDC, the nearest thing that we can call an influence between crypto and government is coincidence.
Government needs to implement their own rulings wihtin their juriscitions outside there's nothing they can do about it.
As long as there's no threat to whoever leaders that be elected then everything will continue to move forward
and will succeed to coexist with other available digital currencies.