Last few months I saw an article, that make me shocked, how some killer open their mouth in the court to tell the judge how the woman paid them with bitcoin to her husband that is making court to start investigating how the transaction was made to carry out such act. Assume it's fiat money she use to pay the killer, do you think the court will still like to investigate the type of currency used for the operation?
India is trying to Re-ban bitcoin in the country just because some people said is a scam currency.
What is your opinion?
Why will the court do such thing? It would be a waste of time. More likely, they will focus on the "killing" incident, and the mode of payment has nothing to do with it. Imagine if fiat is the medium of payment in this case, will there be changes? The killer won't still be caught due to such reason. They should more investigate to how did the crime happen. I don't really get the topic itself. Why should we be against Bitcoin due to its involvement in crime, wherein it is a fact that other digital currencies and fiat currencies are also being involved to such activities?