Why would i need to provide evidence if something worthy or not ?
thunderjet / toknormal assume / are of the opinion that miners also operate masternodes and are behind Dash price decline. Fine, proof it.
It is not me supporting thunderjet assumption / opinion. And it is not me needing to provide evidence for that assumption / opinion.
This supposed balance of reason is a frequent conception error, since it only works between two parts of an internal debate and leads to endless debates that only waste time.
Faced with third parties, such as the agents of "SaintMarket" that is highly valued in other cases, they do not need proof of their reasonable doubts: Simply having them retracts them in their capital movements. You just have to see the laps against DASH that the famous Instamine has given, despite being explained a thousand times, for example. False or not ... they are perfect bullets for a troll ... and detriment to the project. Distrust is enough to trigger a purchase.
It is the SELLER who must support their thesis and define an attractive investment scenario ... even with respect to real fallacies (and this is a general example, not specific on the point).
A greeting.